Home History History as an Instrument of Contemporary International Conflicts: The Case of the Sudanese States
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

History as an Instrument of Contemporary International Conflicts: The Case of the Sudanese States

  • Joanna Bar
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Different Shades of the Past
This chapter is in the book Different Shades of the Past

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to analyse the historical conditions of the conflict between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan - the origins of the discord and prospects for ending this and the future peaceful coexistence of the two states. The main emphasis will be put on highlighting the most important moments of the history of both Sudanese states - until 2011 common - in order to show in the historical factors the premises of the conflict, which, despite the separation of the two states, has not been ended until today. This conflict already existed in the pre-colonial period, when Arab Muslims from the North organised raids on Christian and animist shepherds from the Dinka and Nuer tribes living in the South to sell them to slave traders. During the colonial period, when Sudan as an Anglo-Egyptian condominium was ruled by the British, the latter, in order to protect minority rights and prevent the Islamisation of the South, perpetuated religious-ethnic divisions, to the detriment of both parts of Sudan, including differences in the pace of economic development. These policies bear at least partial responsibility for the successive phases of the long civil war that erupted after independence (1956), in protest against the unequal treatment of the two parts of the country, followed by attempts to impose Islamic law throughout the state (1983). Today, the two countries should conclude negotiations on the course of the common border and define the principles of cooperation in the field of oil transit. However, the future of the two states will take a separate course, contrary to historical experience, but in accordance with the sense of cultural and civilisational belonging. The Republic of Sudan will permanently enter the Arab world, while the Republic of South Sudan will bind its future to its southern neighbours.

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to analyse the historical conditions of the conflict between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan - the origins of the discord and prospects for ending this and the future peaceful coexistence of the two states. The main emphasis will be put on highlighting the most important moments of the history of both Sudanese states - until 2011 common - in order to show in the historical factors the premises of the conflict, which, despite the separation of the two states, has not been ended until today. This conflict already existed in the pre-colonial period, when Arab Muslims from the North organised raids on Christian and animist shepherds from the Dinka and Nuer tribes living in the South to sell them to slave traders. During the colonial period, when Sudan as an Anglo-Egyptian condominium was ruled by the British, the latter, in order to protect minority rights and prevent the Islamisation of the South, perpetuated religious-ethnic divisions, to the detriment of both parts of Sudan, including differences in the pace of economic development. These policies bear at least partial responsibility for the successive phases of the long civil war that erupted after independence (1956), in protest against the unequal treatment of the two parts of the country, followed by attempts to impose Islamic law throughout the state (1983). Today, the two countries should conclude negotiations on the course of the common border and define the principles of cooperation in the field of oil transit. However, the future of the two states will take a separate course, contrary to historical experience, but in accordance with the sense of cultural and civilisational belonging. The Republic of Sudan will permanently enter the Arab world, while the Republic of South Sudan will bind its future to its southern neighbours.

Downloaded on 14.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111000596-012/html?srsltid=AfmBOooiWmvR4Sp44_r_JKve8GGARueEnXU5PmYJx322kXvXTnTu6INO
Scroll to top button