Startseite Naturwissenschaften Performance and Applications of Semifluidized Bioreactors – A Review
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Performance and Applications of Semifluidized Bioreactors – A Review

  • C. M. Narayanan EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. Juli 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper reviews the design features and performance characteristics of semifluidized bed bioreactors. Both biofilm reactors and immobilized enzyme bioreactors have been analysed. Also, both two phase (liquid – solid) and three phase (gas – liquid – solid) operations are considered. Apart from the hydrodynamic parameters (semifluidization velocity, bed expansion ratio, height of packed section formed, fractional fluid holdups in both fluidized and packed sections), all other operating/system parameters affecting reactor performance such as axial dispersion, intrinsic kinetics of bioconversion (mostly nonlinear), the effectiveness factor and Thiele – type modulus have also been surveyed. The specific advantages and attractive features of these bioreactors have been highlighted based on data from successful case studies such as bioplastic synthesis, biodiesel manufacture, Xanthan gum production and aerobic waste water treatment with and without LPO (Liquid Phase Oxygen) utilization.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to his young students, Tripti De, Shrijita Das and Subrata Biswas, who worked hand – in – hand with him during the execution of the research projects discussed in this paper. Special vote of thanks to all fellow members of the International Research Group (IRG), to a number of consultancy firms and software companies of India and abroad for their ingenuous assistances.

Nomenclature

Arm

modified Archimedes number, dimensionless

CA

concentration of hydrogen peroxide, g/L

CB

concentration of methyl acetate, moles/L

CB0

concentration of methyl acetate in feed solution, moles/L

CL

capacity parameter, dimensionless

CS

substrate concentration in liquid, g/L or moles/L

CSe

substrate concentration in product solution, g/L or moles/L

CSO

substrate concentration in feed solution, g/L or moles/L

CSb

substrate concentration at packed – fluidized section interface, g/L or moles/L

CV

Flow parameter, dimensionless

dP

diameter of support particle, m

dPm

diameter of particle-biofilm aggregate, m

D

diameter of bioreactor column, m

De

effective diffusivity of substrate into biofilm, m2/s

DLP

axial dispersion coefficient for packed section, m2/s

DLf

axial dispersion coefficient for fluidized section, m2/s

Eo

Eo ̈tvo ̈s number, dimensionless

f

volume fraction of biofilm in particle-biofilm aggregate, m3/m3

fD

drag coefficient, dimensionless

Frg

gas phase Froude number, dimensionless

FrL

liquid phase Froude number, dimensionless

KC

Contois kinetic constant, dimensionless

KLP

LPO utilization coefficient, g/L

KS

kinetic constant, g/L or moles/L

KS1, KS2

kinetic constants, moles/L

KSi

substrate inhibition coefficient, g/L or moles/L

LSf

total height of semifluidized bed, m

L

characteristic dimension of particle-biofilm aggregate/solid phase, m

Lf

height of fluidized section, m

LP

height of packed section, m

LS

height of initial static bed, m

Mo

Morton number, dimensionless

Qo

volume flow rate of substrate solution, m3/s

(rS)int

intrinsic rate of bioconversion, g/L.s or moles/(L.s)

rmax

kinetic constant, moles/(L.s)

R

bed expansion ratio, dimensionless

Remf

Reynolds number at minimum fluidization, dimensionless

ReP

particle Reynolds number, dimensionless

ReT

modified Reynolds number, dimensionless

Ug

average superficial velocity of gas, m/s

Umf

minimum fluidization velocity of liquid in liquid – solid fluidized bed, m/s

USL

operating superficial velocity of liquid, m/s

USLmin

minimum semifluidization velocity of liquid, m/s

USLmax

maximum semifluidization velocity of liquid, m/s

Vt

terminal free settling velocity of particle-biofilm aggregate, m/s

WeL

Weber number, dimensionless

Wem

modified Weber number, dimensionless

xf

biomass (cell mass) concentration in biofilm, g/L

Y

overall yield coefficient for cell mass production, mg/mg

α

fractional conversion of substrate, dimensionless

β

parameter defined in eq. (28), dimensionless

δ

biofilm thickness, m

ε

bed voidage (fluid holdup in the bed), dimensionless

εf

total fluid holdup in fluidized section, dimensionless

εfg

fractional gas holdup in fluidized section, dimensionless

εfL

fractional liquid holdup in fluidized section, dimensionless

εP

total fluid holdup in packed section, dimensionless

εPg

fractional gas holdup in packed section, dimensionless

εPL

fractional liquid holdup in packed section, dimensionless

η

effectiveness factor, dimensionless

μL

liquid viscosity, kg/(m.s)

μm

maximum specific growth rate, s1

ρL

liquid density, kg/m3

ρm

density of microbial solution, kg/m3

ρS

density of support particle, kg/m3

ρSm

density of particle-biofilm aggregate, kg/m3

σL

interfacial tension, N/m

Thiele-type modulus, dimensionless

References

Al-Dibouni, M. R., and J. Garside. 1979. “Voidage of Liquid Fluidised Beds.” Transactions of the Institutions of Chemical Engineers 57: 94–98.Suche in Google Scholar

Anjana, D.N., and S. Kumar. 2008. “Kinetic modeling of lactic acid production from molasses using Enterococcus faecalis RKY1.” Biochemical Engineering Journal 3 (38): 277–84.Suche in Google Scholar

Begovich, J.M., and J.S. Watson. 1978. Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Three-Phase Fluidized Beds, Fluidization. Cambridge: University Press. 190–95.10.2172/6919977Suche in Google Scholar

Biswas, S.,2015. "Computer Aided Performance Analysis of Three Phase Fluidized/Semifluidized Bed Biofilm Reactors with Special Reference to Waste Water Treatment." M.Tech diss, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India.Suche in Google Scholar

Chern, S-H., L-S. Fan, and K. Muroyama. 1984. “Hydrodynamics of Cocurrent Gas- Liquid-Solid Semifluidization with Liquid as the Continuous Phase.” American Institute of Chemical Engineers journal 30: 288–94.10.1002/aic.690300218Suche in Google Scholar

Dakshinamurthy, P., V. Subramanyam, and J.N. Rao. 1971. “Bed Porosities in Gas-Liquid Fluidization.” Industrial Engineering Chemical Proceedings Design and Development 10: 322–28.10.1021/i260039a008Suche in Google Scholar

Dakshinamurthy, P., V. Subramanyam, and J.N. Rao. 1972. “Bed Porosities in Gas-Liquid Fluidization.” Industrial Engineering Chemical Proceedings Design and Development 11: 318–19.10.1021/i260042a031Suche in Google Scholar

Das, Shrijita, 2016. "Studies on Synthesis of Lactic Acid from Cheese whey and Molasses in Semifluidized and Inverse Fluidized Biofilm Reactors." M.Tech.Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India.Suche in Google Scholar

De, Tripti, 2017. "Studies on Synthesis of Biodiesel in Enzyme Fluidized Bed Bioreactors." PhD Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India.Suche in Google Scholar

De, Tripti, J. Sikder, and C. M. Narayanan. 2017. “Biodiesel Synthesis Using Immobilized Lipase Enzyme in Semi – Fluidised Bed Bioreactors – Bioreactor Design and Performance Analysis, Env.” Protection Sustainable Energy 36 (5): 1537–45.10.1002/ep.12602Suche in Google Scholar

Gottifredi, J.C., and E.E. Gonzo. 2005. “Approximate Expression for Effectivenesss factor Estimation.” Chemical Engineering Journal 109: 83–85.10.1016/j.cej.2005.03.012Suche in Google Scholar

Jena, H.M., 2009. "Hydrodynamics of Gas-Liquid-Solid Fluidized and Semi-fluidized Beds." PhD Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India.10.1016/j.powtec.2009.07.022Suche in Google Scholar

Jena, H.M., G.K. Roy, and B. C. Meikap. 2005. “Development of Comparative Study of a Semifluidized Bed Bioreactor for Treatment of Waste Water from Process Industries.” Proceedings Plant Engineering Environmental Management 23: 73–75.Suche in Google Scholar

Jena, H.M., B. K. Sahho, G.K. Roy, and B. C. Meikap. 2008. “Characterization of Hydrodynamic Properties of a G –L –S Three Phase Fluidized bed with glass bead particles.” Chemical Engineering Journal 145: 50–56.10.1016/j.cej.2008.03.002Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, S.P., C.G.J. Baker, and M.A. Bergougnou. 1975. “Phase Holdup Characteristics of Three Phase Fluidized Beds.” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 53: 134–39.10.1002/cjce.5450530126Suche in Google Scholar

Kurian, J., and M. Raja Rao. 1970. “Hydrodynamics of Semi – Fluidised Bed.” Indian Journal of Technology 8: 275–94.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, S.L.P., and H.L. de Lasa. 1987. “Phase holdups in three phase fluidized beds.” American Institute of Chemical Engineers journal 33: 1359–70.10.1002/aic.690330813Suche in Google Scholar

Maeda, M, A Itoh, and Y. Kawase. 2005. “Kinetics for Aerobic Biological Treatment of o – Cresol Containing Waste Waters in a Slurry Bioreactor: Biodegradation by Utilizing Waste Activated Sludge.” Biochemical Engineering Journal 22: 97–103.10.1016/j.bej.2004.09.005Suche in Google Scholar

Mydlarz, J. 1987. “Prediction of the packed bed height in liquid solid semi – Fluidisation of homogeneous mixtures.” Chemical Engineering Journal 34: 155–58.10.1016/0300-9467(87)85018-9Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, C.M. 2009. “Modeling and Simulation of Fluidised Bed Bioreactors with Liquid Phase Oxygen Utilization.” International Journal Transport Phenomena 11 (2): 127–32.Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, C. M., 2013. Performance Analysis of Semi - fluidised Bed Biofilm Reactors with Liquid Phase Oxygen (LPO) Utilization, Proc.14th International Conference on Fluidization - From Fundamentals to Products. ECI Symposium Series, htt:lldc.enconfintl.or fluidization xiv/12.Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, C. M. 2015. “Studies on Computer Aided Design and Analysis of Three Phase Semifluidized Bed Bioreactors.” Chemical Products Process Modeling 10 (1): 55–70.10.1515/cppm-2014-0029Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, C.M., M. Banik, and S. Halder. 2011. “Performance Analysis of Immobilized Enzyme Semifluidized Bed Bioreactors.” International Journal Chemical Reactor Engineering 9 (1): Article A111.10.2202/1542-6580.2670Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, C. M., and S. Biswas. 2015. “Computer Aided Design and Analysis of Three Phase Fluidized Bed Biofilm Reactors for Waste Water Treatment.” Asian Journal of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Research 5 (2): 224–49.Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, C. M., and S. Biswas. 2016. “Studies on Waste Water Treatment in Three Phase Semifluidised Bed Bioreactors – Computer Aided Analysis and Software Development.” Journal of Modern Chemistry and Chemical Technology 7: 1–21.Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, C.M., and Shrijita Das. 2017. “Studies on Synthesis of Lactic Acid from Molasses and Cheese Whey in Semifluidized Bed Biofilm Reactors, Int.” Journal of Environment and Waste Management 19 (1): 1–10.Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, C.M., Shrijita Das, and Aditi Pandey. 2017. Green Technologies for Manufacture of Valuable Products from Food and Agricultural Wastes. Handbook of Food Bioengineering. Vol.2, Chapter 1. London: Academic Press(Elsevier). 1–52.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramesh, K., and T. Murugesan. 2002. “Minimum fluidization velocity and gas holdup in gas – Liquid – Solid fluidized reactors.” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 77: 129–36.10.1002/jctb.533Suche in Google Scholar

Richardson, J. F., and W. N. Zaki. 1954. “Sedimentation and Fluidization, Part – I.” Transactions Institute Chemical Engineers 32: 35–38.Suche in Google Scholar

Roy, G. K., 1975. "Studies on certain aspects of semifluidization." PhD Thesis, Sambalpur University, India.Suche in Google Scholar

Roy, G. K., and H.N. Sharat Chandra. 1972. “Liquid – Solid semi – Fluidization of homogeneous mixtures – Prediction of semifluidization velocity.” Chemical Engineering Journal 12: 77–80.10.1016/0300-9467(76)80020-2Suche in Google Scholar

Roy, G. K., and K. J. R. Sharma. 1972. “Dynamics of liquid – Solid semi – Fluidisation III.” Chemical Engineering Journal 4: 294–96.10.1016/0300-9467(72)80028-5Suche in Google Scholar

Roy, G. K., and K. J. R. Sharma. 1973. “Dynamics of liquid – Solid semi – Fluidisation: Prediction of Semi – Fluidisation velocity and Packed Bed formation.” Indian Journal of Technology 11: 237–41.Suche in Google Scholar

Saberian-Broudjenni, M., G. Wild, J.-C. Charpentier, Y. Fortin, J.-P. Euzen, and R. Patoux. 1987. “Contribution to the hydrodynamic study of gas-liquid-solid fluidized-bed reactors.” International Chemical Engineering 27: 423–40.Suche in Google Scholar

Schepers, A.W., J. Thibault, and C. Lacroix. 2002. “Lactobacillus helveticus Growth and Lactic Acid Production During pH-controlled Batch Cultures In Whey Permeate/Yeast Extract Medium. Part-I. Multiple Factor Kinetic Analysis.” Enzyme and Microbial Technology 30 (2): 176–86.10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00465-3Suche in Google Scholar

Singh, A. N., H. K. Takhalate, A. Storck, and P. Sengupta. 1980. “A correlation for the prediction of packed bed height in liquid – Solid semi – Fluidisation.” Chemical Engineering Journal 20: 69–73.10.1016/0300-9467(80)85007-6Suche in Google Scholar

Sivakumar, V., T. Kannadasan, and K. Senthilkumar. 2010. “Prediction of gas holdup in three phase fluidized bed.” Polish Journal Chemical Technical 12 (4): 64–71.10.2478/v10026-010-0053-7Suche in Google Scholar

Wen, C. Y., and Y. H. Yu. 1966. “A Generalized Method for Predicting the Minimum Fluidization Velocity.” American Institute of Chemical Engineers journal 12: 610–12.10.1002/aic.690120343Suche in Google Scholar

Zabot, G.L. et ., 2011. “Hybrid modeling of Xanthan gum bioproduction in batch bioreactor.” Bioprocess Biosystems Engineering 34: 975–86.10.1007/s00449-011-0548-5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2017-09-24
Revised: 2018-07-03
Accepted: 2018-07-09
Published Online: 2018-07-21

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 15.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2017-0178/html?lang=de&srsltid=AfmBOoosDnX4i40FAnfT1HMAI-mfceHy2RHWfKkGBbKs60mUkzSkTthO
Button zum nach oben scrollen